The Opium Wars — a naked move by the British state to control the drug trade — had perhaps also given Marx the idea about religion as the opium of the people. But in political terms, the main point in the manifesto is that capitalism, apart from the process of the primitive accumulation of wealth through theft and naval power, also by necessity creates a domestic power which is both the source of wealth and also the main danger to it; namely the proletariat.
This class is what Mary Shelley was writing about when she conceived of Frankenstein's monster; a gigantic, powerful beast which is the inevitable product of industry, technology and modernity but which has the potential to turn on it and destroy it once it realises the power it possesses and finds its voice. Chapter one of the manifesto maintains that in the place of the "manifold gradations" of feudal society, bourgeois capitalism has simplified class antagonisms, reducing society down to a basic competition between a bourgeois class — who owned the means of production — and a growing proletariat — who had only their labour power to sell in order to live.
The enclosure of the lands, the urbanisation of rural workers and the creation of heavy industry were all absolutely necessary to the extension of capital and yet the same process was to create associations of workers who would combine to defend their own rights.
For Marx, this was not just a political competition but an immanent structural antagonism which would "inevitably lead to the victory of the proletariat" over the bourgeoisie who, in developing the productive forces, had created their own "gravediggers". Like sacred scripture, it engendered a body of orthodox interpretation, carefully constructed to fit to the changing world scene what were considered its universal propositions.
But what of the intrinsic qualities of the Manifesto? What assures that it will be read and discussed regardless of political circumstances? Marx and Engels, it would seem, intended the Manifesto not only to make clear to the world the political positions and views of Communists, in order to dispel the specter of misconception, but to also describe the causes and directions of historical change as manifested through the clear-eyed view of Communists. In brief form, the Manifesto presents nothing less than a unified theory of historical dynamics, with class struggle as the central motive and all manifestations of politics and culture, including art and literature, derived from the prevailing system of material production.
This gives way to an almost exuberant characterization of capitalist productive achievement that still holds our attention as a completely recognizable portrait of the relentless drive of modern industry and trade. But Marx and Engels ultimately are concerned with the advent of a world in which the conditions of life will be uniformly benign and in which human relations will be in some way improved.
What would be the moral basis of such a world? In the end, readers of the Manifesto must confront a paradox that arises whenever we conceive of the individual as largely determined by circumstances. For the Manifesto is both a prediction of an inevitable course of history and a rallying cry to act in a certain way for the purpose of bringing about change and improvement.
How to act autonomously in a world determined by forces more powerful than the individual is a timeless question. Karl Marx was born in to a professional family in Prussia with liberal political leanings, which, at that time, were likely to attract police surveillance. After a vigorous academic career at the University of Berlin, where he was influenced by the historical doctrines of the philosopher Hegel, Marx became editor of a radical newspaper in Cologne, which was soon suppressed.
He then left with his new wife for Paris, where he began to meet with Communist organizations of French and German workers and formulate his socialist views. Friedrich Engels, born in , came from a family of affluent industrialists and quickly developed a capacity for leading a double life.
In , he published his classic study of the social ravages of industrialized society, The Condition of the Working Class in England. Marx and Engels began their lifelong partnership to establish what has become known as Marxist Communism during a ten-day visit in Paris in Engels was brisk and lighthearted, with all the social refinements of a bourgeois gentleman, while Marx was the stereotype of the ponderous scholar — slow, careful, and somber. Though he lived in London for thirty-four years, Marx never learned to speak English fluently; Engels was fluent in more than a dozen languages.
In , Engels helped organize the Communist League in London; the following year, he and Marx drafted a statement of principles for this group, Manifesto of the Communist Party. By this time, Marx had moved to Brussels after a series of expulsions from France and Germany. After the unsuccessful European revolutions of , which occurred immediately after the publication of the Manifesto , Marx returned to Germany to edit a newspaper.
When this failed, he settled permanently in London in Earning very little from his writing and dependent on the generosity of Engels, Marx pursued his studies in economic and social history in the library at the British Museum. During fourteen years of isolation from politics, he began to write a series of books on economic theory.
The culmination of these writings was his greatest work, Capital , for which Engels provided essential information about business practices and industrial operations. Until his death in , he was generally regarded as the foremost authority on the body of economic and social theory known as Marxism. Create a personalised ads profile.
Select personalised ads. Apply market research to generate audience insights. Measure content performance. Develop and improve products. List of Partners vendors. Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy named after Karl Marx. It examines the effect of capitalism on labor, productivity, and economic development and argues for a worker revolution to overturn capitalism in favor of communism.
Marxism posits that the struggle between social classes—specifically between the bourgeoisie, or capitalists, and the proletariat, or workers—defines economic relations in a capitalist economy and will inevitably lead to revolutionary communism. Marxism is both a social and political theory, which encompasses Marxist class conflict theory and Marxian economics.
Marxism was first publicly formulated in in the pamphlet The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, which lays out the theory of class struggle and revolution. Marxian economics focuses on the criticisms of capitalism, which Karl Marx wrote about in his book Das Kapital , published in They are driven, he posited, by vast impersonal forces of history that play out through the behavior and conflict among social classes.
According to Marx, every society is divided into social classes, whose members have more in common with one another than with members of other social classes. Thus Marx thought that the capitalist system inherently contained the seeds of its own destruction. The alienation and exploitation of the proletariat that are fundamental to capitalist relations would inevitably drive the working class to rebel against the bourgeoisie and seize control of the means of production.
As a result of the revolution, Marx predicted that private ownership of the means of production would be replaced by collective ownership, first under socialism and then under communism. In the final stage of human development, social classes and class struggle would no longer exist.
Marx and Engels' ideas laid the groundwork for the theory and practice of communism, which advocates for a classless system in which all property and wealth are communally rather than privately owned. Socialism predates communism by several decades. Its early adherents called for a more egalitarian distribution of wealth, solidarity among workers, better working conditions, and common ownership of land and manufacturing equipment.
Socialism is based on the idea of public ownership of the means of production , but individuals may still own property. Rather than arising out of a class revolution, socialist reform takes place within the existing social and political structures, whether they're democratic, technocratic, oligarchic, or totalitarian.
To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:. Other access options You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile.
Rent this content from DeepDyve. Rent from DeepDyve. If you think you should have access to this content, click to contact our support team.
0コメント